Adapting to climate change faster will save Canada billions, new analysis shows
In
2021, severe weather caused $2.1 billion in insured damages
Mia Rabson · The Canadian
Press
Original story here
Remnants of Big
Island Road in Nova Scotia after Hurricane Fiona. A new analysis estimates that
Canada is already looking at annual disaster recovery bills of $5 billion by
2025 and $17 billion by 2050, regardless of how well Canada and the rest of the
world do at cutting emissions. (Lynn Arsenault)
Canadians will see
lower incomes and a choice between higher taxes or fewer government services if
there isn't more effort to adapt to the changing climate, a new report from The
Canadian Climate Institute warns.
But according to
the report released Wednesday, if governments and the private sector
buckle up and start investing in making Canada more resilient to the effects of
extreme weather, the economic impact of climate change can be cut by 75 per
cent.
"The good news
story is we have some ability to change this future," said Ryan Ness, the
director of adaptation research for the climate institute.
In its analysis,
called Damage Control, the institute looked at projected economic growth and
analyzed the effect of different scenarios based on how many greenhouse gas
emissions are eliminated and what we do to prepare for more frequent severe
weather.
The worst news is
that in every scenario, Canada's climate is already changing and more severe
weather — drought, forest fires, flooding and damaging storms — is already
upon us.
In 2021, severe
weather caused $2.1 billion in insured damages, which does not include costs
related to public infrastructure or uninsured private losses.
The analysis
estimates that Canada is already looking at annual disaster recovery bills of
$5 billion by 2025 and $17 billion by 2050, regardless of how well Canada and the
rest of the world do at cutting emissions.
It says that to
prevent a loss in government services, including to health care or education,
income taxes would have to increase by 0.35 per cent in 2025, compared to now,
and get one per cent higher by 2050.
"Negative
economic impacts are not just a future prospect. They're already happening
today," said Ness.
In the last week,
Atlantic Canada was hit by post-tropical storm Fiona, causing widespread
damage, and Canadians in parts of Ontario and western Quebec are still
recovering after a derecho pummelled the region with multiple tornadoes and
downbursts bringing winds up to 190 km/h in May.
Beyond higher
reconstruction costs, Canada is also facing massive economic disruptions as
factories are closed during storms or extreme heat and supply chains are
disrupted. Railways and highways might fail faster than expected under the
stress of more extreme weather.
Make investments
now to save money, report urges
Construction will
get an economic boost, but only because it needs to step in to repair and
replace damaged structures and transportation corridors, the report says.
If we do nothing
more to adapt in anticipation of more severe weather, it says, the economy will
take a $25 billion hit in 2025, rising to between $78 billion and $101 billion
by 2050.
The fallout would
be felt across the board, with lower incomes, job losses, lower business
investments and cuts to exports.
But if every effort
is made to limit global warming by cutting greenhouse gas emissions, the report
says, and Canada makes the needed investments to add resilience to public and
private infrastructure, things will look better.
The report suggests
that for every $1 invested in adaptation, governments and businesses can save
$5 to $6 in direct damage costs, and another $6 to $10 in economic benefits,
such as avoiding work stoppages or productivity slowdowns.
Adaptation can
include seawalls to protect low-lying communities, laying down
temperature-resistant asphalt, or upgrading or burying critical power lines.
Ness said it is
"much more efficient economically to spend the money upfront on making
that infrastructure better and more resilient than it is to fix it when climate
change breaks it."
The institute says
the government needs to start incorporating the costs of climate change into
all its economic decisions. That includes reporting on the estimated costs of
not making planned investments.
It also needs to
encourage, and in some cases mandate, the private sector to do the same.
And most
importantly, it needs to increase its investments in adaptation to match the
risk we're facing, the institute says.
Ness said the
national adaptation strategy expected from the federal government this fall is
a good place to start, but he said it will only work if the strategy comes with
major new investments and actions.
It is so refreshing to hear some positive thoughts There is still hope
ReplyDelete